Skip Navigation
CFPB Buried, Ignored Positive Cash Advance Customer “Tell Your Tale” Testimonials It Requested

CFPB Buried, Ignored Positive Cash Advance Customer “Tell Your Tale” Testimonials It Requested

Alexandria, Va. – New documents released today unveil for the very first time more than 12,000 good testimonials that payday loan clients presented to the customer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) included in the Bureau’s “Tell Your Story” effort. These consumer that is positive, which comprise 98% for the payday loan-related submissions, have not been made general general public prior to. Rather, the Bureau buried and ignored these customer that is real-life since it marched forward with proposed guidelines that will limit use of credit for scores of People in the us.

The client tales had been unearthed by way of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) demand filed December 31, 2015 by a representative associated with the Community Financial solutions Association of America (CFSA) – the trade relationship that represents the lending industry that is short-term. During the period that is five-year by the FOIA request, 12,308 commentary associated with 12,546 responses presented on short-term loans praised the industry and its own services and products, or perhaps indicated good experiences.

The FOIA documents also unveiled just a very tiny amount of critical payday lending remarks had been submitted towards the CFPB – just 240 or not as much as 2%. What’s more, the majority that is vast of critical comments were either erroneously categorized as payday responses or they relate solely to frauds and unregulated lenders that the CFPB’s proposed rule does not deal with.


  • For the 12,546 opinions submitted in to the CFPB’s “Tell Your tale” portal, 12,308 remarks – or maybe more than 98% — praised the industry as well as its services and products.
  • Less than 240 consumer opinions – significantly less than 2% — had been negative.
    • Associated with the 240 negative responses, 84 remarks had been mistakenly classified as payday financing commentary. They would not reference the lending that is payday, but instead bank complaints, insurance coverage complaints, and education loan complaints, among others examples.
    • Regarding the 240 negative remarks, 74 feedback pertaining to lending that is payday and/or unregulated loan providers, both crucial consumer security conditions that the CFPB’s proposed rule doesn’t address.

This information is in keeping with grievance information through the CFPB and FTC, too surveys of pay day loan customers. Because the CFPB’s grievance portal came online last year, complaints regarding pay day loans have now been that is miniscule 1.5% of all of the complaints. Meanwhile, these complaints continue steadily to decrease. The CFPB information mirrors customer complaints towards the Federal Trade Commission. The FTC found that just 0.003% of more than three million complaints related to payday lending in its summary of 2015 consumer complaints. Both in the CFPB information and FTC information, mortgages, charge cards and lots of other services that are financial exponentially greater variety of customer complaints.

Consumer studies of pay day loan borrowers confirm their satisfaction that is overwhelming with item. A GSG/Tarrance survey discovered that 96% of borrowers saw pay day loans as of good use and a huge bulk would suggest the solution to other people, showcasing the service to their satisfaction. A youthful Harris Interactive survey of cash advance borrowers online payday loans direct lenders Arkansas had comparable findings. Ninety-seven per cent of borrowers had been content with the item and 95% value obtaining the choice to just simply take down an online payday loan.

“The Bureau is pursuing its ideological crusade contrary to the regulated lending that is short-term along with its proposed rules, while ignoring the good experiences provided by customers,” said Dennis Shaul, CEO of CFSA. “While claiming to hear customers through the “Tell Your Story” effort, the CFPB discounts real consumers’ requirements and choices. It really is clear that an incredible number of individuals are pleased with the loan that is payday and solutions, plus don’t wish the government to just just take this respected credit choice far from them.”

The Bureau has very very long advertised that its problem database functions as its regulatory compass, and CFPB Director Richard Cordray recently told the Wall Street Journal that the database is a component for the agency’s DNA and plays a key part in leading its aspects of focus and enforcement actions. The CFPB’s “Tell Your Story” initiative now verifies the true figures within the CFPB’s issue database; ındividuals are pleased with payday advances. Nonetheless, the CFPB’s disingenuous and heavy-handed actions demonstrably raise questions regarding its goals and whether preserving Americans’ usage of dependable and affordable short-term credit services and products is a priority.

People in the us nationwide ardently disagree using the variety of unneeded overreach regarding the short-term financing industry proposed by the CFPB. When you look at the GSG/Tarrance survey, 74% of borrowers stated these are generally worried about more restrictions on pay day loans by the national federal government and 80% believe present regulations are sufficient. When you look at the survey that is same more or less two-thirds of borrowers oppose the proposed CFPB laws.

“Consumers realize these loan services and products and work out informed decisions whenever they require short-term credit,” said Shaul. “But the Bureau has constantly disregarded their viewpoint, playing a large number of unique interest teams and customer activist companies instead of some of the an incredible number of US customers who can face the harsh effects of its rulemaking.”