Skip Navigation
We’ve expertise in coping with course actions in an extensive variety of areas, including

We’ve expertise in coping with course actions in an extensive variety of areas, including

Class actions have already been authorized by Alberta legislation since 2004, although class actions were allowed in Alberta prior to the 2004 Class Proceedings Act. Course actions are complicated, specialized and litigation that is expensive clients involved with course actions would be best served by solicitors who possess considerable experience with their particular features.

McLennan Ross solicitors have years of expertise with course actions and their predecessor procedures, that have provided them the ability to help you through the numerous unique and issues that are complex happen. We are able to work with you with all the strategic and financial, along with the appropriate, choices that really must be taken through this course of a course continuing to manage danger and value while protecting your passions.

Basic counsel of a few of the biggest organizations in Canada choose McLennan Ross as Alberta counsel in big, complex and class that is multijurisdictional. Our extensive experience encompasses both the Plaintiff and Defendant part of course actions, and our attorneys happen involved with every part of the specific litigation pre-certification disputes, official official official certification being a class proceeding, instance administration, typical problems test, settlement and Court approval, and circulation of profits to course users.

It is critical to keep in mind that we recognize some great benefits of alternative resolution that is dispute whenever feasible. We have, as an example, assisted customers in resolving complex course procedures through multiparty mediation processes. We’ve expertise in working with course actions in a range that is wide of, including:

McLennan Ross ended up being counsel for the Defendant audit firm relating to this course action brought against it plus the Alberta Securities Commission (ASC) linked to the failure of home financing financial institution. McLennan Ross had been effective in getting the Court purchase that the matter could maybe perhaps not proceed as a course action after which effectively defended the situation at test, as well as counsel for Alberta Justice protecting the ASC.

Anderson v. Pan-Alberta Gas/NOVA

McLennan Ross represented Pan-Alberta petrol (PAG), a wholly owned subsidiary of NOVA, regarding the a big claim brought against PAG by a number of big propane manufacturers. The allegation ended up being a breach of fiduciary responsibility by PAG, a gasoline aggregator, and also the damages reported were within the tens of vast amounts. The claim encompassed operations throughout the united states by PAG, and involved considerable document manufacturing. We had been required to check with specialists in Calgary, Washington and Houston. We effectively sent applications for a purchase which needed the Plaintiffs to continue using the action as a course continuing on behalf of all of the gasoline manufacturers in Alberta whom provided gasoline to PAG. The action settled shortly thereafter.

Betthel et al v. Lord Conrad Ebony McLennan Ross acted for starters of this Defendants in this course action earned Saskatchewan, Ontario and Quebec, alleging that Lord Black and Hollinger involved in a true amount of deals that have been incorrect and operated towards the prejudice associated with the minority investors of Hollinger. After a preliminary application in Saskatchewan regarding jurisdiction, the Plaintiffs discontinued as against our customer.

Bruley v. Instaloans Financial Solution Centres McLennan Ross acted when it comes to Defendants in this course action commenced in Ontario against a payday lender, that was solved within the general settlement of course procedures against our consumers in every jurisdictions, with the exception of Uk Columbia (see Downey and Tschritter below).

Condominium Corporation Surbey et al McLennan Ross acted for a wide range of Defendants in a course action where in fact the representative Plaintiff purported to carry an action with respect to all people who own a 500 device condominium complex in Fort McMurray. The Court unearthed that the class proceeding as proposed ended up being basically problematic and failed to give official certification.

Delf v. Merit Energy McLennan Ross represented the auditors of Merit Energy, an oil that is public fuel business which had become insolvent. Actions had been commenced in Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta. The action had been settled after examinations for development and a mediation that is lengthy, over which George Adams, Q.C., presided. The Alberta settlement, authorized because of the Court, ended up being affirmed by Court instructions in Ontario and British Columbia.

Downey v. Instaloans Financial possibilities Centres McLennan Ross acted when it comes to Defendants in this course action commenced in Ontario against a loan that is payday, that has been fixed as part of the general settlement associated with Ontario and Alberta course proceedings against our consumers. The settlement agreements had been authorized by the Courts in Ontario and Alberta.